More writing from Brian Libby

« It Wasn't Such a Bad Little Tree | Main | Mister T: Man of the People »



I don't understand the reasoning. While it's true that video is merely a representation of the light, film is also only a representation of the light, partly determined by the chemical makeup of the film, and partly determined by the chemicals used to processes it. Even if one is there in person to see the actual light directly, what one sees is still only one's mind's representation of the light. Only the light is the light. Showing the film, the lens might have a hair in it, or the screen might have a tear. Hell, maybe the viewer took some LSD and is adding all sorts of things to the film. The way a film is viewed can inadvertantly be altered any number of ways. That doesn't mean the film is ruined.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter
    Blog powered by Typepad