Two stories from today's Oregonian point to battles over where to build, what funds to do it with, and by what standards they should be kept.
First, Mark Larabee reports that a pair of lawsuits against the city are freezing its ability to go forward with the Resource Access Center, the $48 million homeless shelter and day center designed by Holst Architecture of Portland, as well as redevelopment of the US Post Office building downtown by the city.
One suit is challenging the City Council's vote last summer to spend $19 million in urban renewal funds for the River District on building an elementary school in the David Douglas School District in outer, outer southeast Portland. The other suit is challenging the expansion of the River District approved by the council that increased tax revenue available for projects from $225 to $583 million.
Who is filing these suits? According to Larabee's article, it's an unnamed group of 10 people who call themselves Friends of Urban Renewal. Former Portland Development Commission general counsel Oliver Norville is one of them. He told Larabee the main concern is over the idea of David Douglas as satellite for the River District. But even if the city reverses course on the school, the increased River District funding is still a concern to the Friends group, who see the expansion there as "not proper expenditures of tax increment funds," in Norville's words.
Norville also says the city has been unwilling to negotiate with the Friends of Urban Renewal, and that's why the lawsuits have gone forward. Commissioner Nick Fish, however, had harsh words for the group, saying "they took the River District hostage and poor people are paying the price."
So, who is the good guy and who is the bad guy here? This is not a rhetorical question. I'm still trying to figure it out myself. I lean so far towards being against the lawsuit because of its effects but in at least partial agreement about some of the issues involved. There ought to be a better way to settle this.
The idea of these hardball legal tactics preventing the much-needed Resource Access Center for Portland's homeless from getting built is pretty stinky. So is the idea of freezing other River District renewal funds during this terrible economic downturn. We don't need delays on these project--we need them fast tracked.
Still, I personally agree that it's wrong to give River District urban renewal funds to David Douglas or any place outside the River District. And I at least can't disagree with the Friends' other assertion, that added urban renewal funds for the River District might be better spent elsewhere in the city. On that second point, I'm really still in deliberation mode. I also am still trying to decide if the Friends of Urban Renewal name is apt or if it's ironic.
Meanwhile, firebrand Commissioner Randy Leonard is at it again. As Lisa Grace Lednicer reported today, Leonard has helped create a code-enforcement task force that targets and actively goes after some of the city's worst code violators. Some are complaining because of the secrecy associated with the group, and others because the enforcers don't necessarily just target the worst code offenders uniformly - they pick and choose based in part on anecdotal evidence.
Even so, I had to laugh seeing that they'd put the kibosh on Greek Cusina, the rowdy downtown eatery that continually seems to flip its nose at anyone that would question their way of doing things. Leonard's team found some 50 code violations at Greek Cusina, yet its owner, Ted Pappas, still found the gumption to complain that he was being persecuted. This is the same Pappas who tried to organize a boycott of Willamette Week a few years ago when one of its writers, Caryn Brooks, had the audacity to write a particularly unfavorable review of another eatery.
If Pappas is complaining, others, like those living in fleabag residence hotels downtown, are thankful. (Such as George Rumbley of the Westwind Apartments, pictured above in a fine shot by The Oregonian's Fredrick Joe.) From cockroaches to broken boilers, chipping paint to carpet first lain in the Eisenhower administration, Leonard's bunch has succeeded in improving conditions for those living there, and they've been thankful. Nice work, fellas!
i stopped dining at the greek cusina in the late eighties after talking to a neighbor of the Papas' and another person who worked there. this is a food service business run by a family with serious cleanliness issues. good to see nothing's changed...
Posted by: Eric Cantona | February 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM
City Council is squarely to blame on the urban renewal deadlock. They broke the law in doing what they did with the school and the river district expansion. They were warned that thier scheme was not legal and they ignored the advice. Now they have been called on it. Urban Renewal funds are not City Council's personal piggybank to fund thier pet projects. The rules are very clear on what they can and can't do with urban renewal dollars. We should let the River District URA epire and let the tax dollars flow according to the original intent. Extending the URA and increasing debt is just deficit spending and a bad deal for Portland residents and taxpayers. Don't blame the people that filed the lawsuit. The City created thier own mess on this one.
Posted by: T | February 18, 2009 at 03:38 PM
"There ought to be a better way to settle this."
The way to solve it would be for the city to use Urban Renewal funds as allowed by law, rather than as a politically popular piggy bank.
"I also am still trying to decide if the Friends of Urban Renewal name is apt or if it's ironic."
Apt. They are protecting the policy/tax tool from abuse that could erode the legitimacy of the program long term.
Posted by: DE | February 19, 2009 at 11:15 AM
the last thing that is needed around the greyhound station is another homeless shelter. it shouldnt be any surprise that the whole old town and chinatown district isnt improving when you keep building new buildings for homeless.
Posted by: edward | February 19, 2009 at 11:56 PM
where would you like to build housing for the homeless, edward?
Posted by: ben | February 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM
in his backyard!
Posted by: eenie | February 24, 2009 at 04:26 PM
The purple Octopus comes down at 8 AM... the end of the Greek Cusina? Boo to Randy Leonard and his city hit-squad for single-handidly ruining a businessman's dream. Here's to Ted Pappas, may his future be very bright indeed!!!!
Posted by: Scott Tice | January 04, 2010 at 07:13 AM
I'm no expert, but Ted Pappas didn't seem like such a saint to me when he was threatening food critics (Caryn Brooks of Willamette Week) or trying to drive out food carts. And Greek Cusina also seems to run its business with a sizable contempt for city regulations. It does appear that Pappas was singled out, and perhaps more than is fair. But it's not a black and white issue, based on what I've seen and heard.
Posted by: Brian Libby | January 04, 2010 at 10:00 AM
this is what i just posted on this story at the Mercury blog:
knowing people that have worked there, as well as a neighbor of the Papas family, the recent fire and safety violations followed a storied history of health violations. in short, this place has been a blight on the city for two decades at least.
good f-ing riddance.
Posted by: Eric Cantona | January 04, 2010 at 03:46 PM