A couple weeks ago the American Institute of Architects' Committee on the Environment released its annual Top Ten Green Projects list.
As described by the AIA, the program "celebrates projects that are the result of a thoroughly integrated approach to architecture, natural systems and technology. They make a positive contribution to their communities, improve comfort for building occupants and reduce environmental impacts through strategies such as reuse of existing structures, connection to transit systems, low-impact and regenerative site development, energy and water conservation, use of sustainable or renewable construction materials, and design that improves indoor air quality."
Considering that Portland has often been called the nation's greenest city, and at various times we've had the most LEED-rated projects in the nation, you'd think we'd be all over this list, either the new one or past lists of the top 10 green projects. Actually, though, that's not the case at all.
This year's AIA/COTE Top 10 honors projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Boston, Seattle, Wisconsin and elsewhere. But there's not one project from Portland. And if you look back at past years of COTE lists, Portland has hardly any presence at all.
Last year, the Gerding Theater at the Armory by GBD Architects (pictured above) received an Honorable Mention, but still failed to crack the 2007 Top 10 list despite being one of the nation's first ever LEED Platinum rated historic renovations. A Eugene project with an assist from a Portland firm was on the list, the Morse US Courthouse, but legendary architect Thom Mayne is really the auteur of that project, not DLR Group.
In 2006, a Portland project indeed made the list, the Lloyd Crossing Sustainable Design Plan, but it wasn't a work of architecture and it wasn't from a Portland firm (the designer was Mithun of Seattle). 2004 had no Portland firms or projects on the list, nor did 2003. In 2002 the modest but very sustainable Bank of Astoria in Manzanita by Oregon coast architect Tom Bender made the list, but that's still not Portland. The awards began in 1997, but if you go all the way back to the beginning, there is still no accolade for local firm or project.
Meanwhile, our northern neighbors in Seattle are all over the COTE Top 10 list almost every time. This year's list includes the Discovery Center at South Lake Union in Seattle by local firm Miller/Hull Partnership, as well as the Pocono Environmental Education Center by Seattle firm Bohlin Cywinski Jackson. Miller/Hull, Bohlin Cywinski Jackson, Mahlum Architects and Mithun, all from the home of the NFL's Sea-turkeys, each have multiple AIA/COTE Top 10 finishes: Mithun for two different REI stores and the Puget Sound Environmental Learning Center, Miller Hull for this year's Lake Union project as well as past list-makers the Bainbridge Island City Hall and Pierce County Environmental Services, and even Mahlum has both Ben Franklin Elementary in Kirkland and and a building at Evergreen State College in Olympia.
So here's the question: Does the history of the COTE top 10 show that Portland is over-rated as a green building city, that it's under-recognized, both or neither? I think of landmark sustainable projects here like GBD's Center For Health and Healing at OHSU, a LEED Platinum rated design that's a whopping 50% more energy efficient than code, which is stunning for such a big building. Or the Ecotrust Natural Capital Center in the Pearl. Or the net-zero energy Rose House by SERA Architects. Or the Brewery Blocks. They're all supposed to be leading-edge sustainable projects. Are they not? Or if they are, why aren't they on the list?
Then again, maybe it's just the nature of awards and lists. I mean, other than maybe this year and a few other exceptions, the Academy Awards almost never pick the right film for Best Picture. Rocky over Taxi Driver? Oliver over 2001: A Space Odyssey? Crash over...anything? Even Kevin Costner has a Best Director Oscar and neither Alfred Hitchcock nor Orson Welles ever got one. 'Nuff said.
Even so, I'm curious whether people think COTE ignores Portland, or whether we're not as special as we think.
How many and which projects in Portland were submitted to the awards program?
If no projects here were submitted then it makes since that none would win. Not knowing this it is hard to comment.
Posted by: Clint | May 08, 2008 at 12:22 PM
How many and which projects in Portland were submitted to the awards program?
If no projects here were submitted then it makes since that none would win. Not knowing this it is hard to comment.
Posted by: Clint | May 08, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Insofar as Bohlin Cywinski Jackson maintains three office in Pennsylvania, it may not be appropriate to attribute the Pocono project (in Penna) to their Seattle office. I'm fairly sure they're a Pittsburgh firm.
As for the awards...meh. I'd like to know what projects were submitted by PDX firms before venturing a guess.
Posted by: h-lin | May 08, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Honestly I don't know which projects were submitted and which weren't. However, I doubt there was a wave of non-submissions from Portland versus other cities.
Regarding Bohlin Cywinski Jackson, h-lin is right. Maybe they're not a Seattle firm first. Anybody know whether they started in PA or WA?
Posted by: Brian Libby | May 08, 2008 at 01:16 PM
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson was started in PA. Their Seattle office opened as a joint venture office with Cutler while working on the Gates residence.
Posted by: clint | May 08, 2008 at 01:31 PM
Bohlin Cywinski Jackson started in Pittsburgh, but it appears the Wilkes-Barre office did the Pocono project.
Posted by: h-lin | May 08, 2008 at 02:02 PM
Brian, you're the first person I've heard comment on Portland's showing at COTE. I'm going to ask around. Portland may be so green that COTE is passe!
Posted by: h-lin | May 08, 2008 at 02:07 PM
You're not awarded if you don't submit. I think this list is relatively unimportant regarding the overall 'greenness' of a place, just on submitted projects
Posted by: DC - the other one | May 08, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I'm not sure what the criteria for COTE are, but if design excellence is as important as green I'm not all that surprised that PDX doesn't have more COTE recognition. Miller/Hull is great example of green and rich, textured designs. I stil find most of the 'green' new construction in PDX are variations on somewhat modernist boxes with design sensuality and gravitas undervalued or value engineered out. The Armory and Eco Trust buildings are restorations that deserved recognition.
Posted by: charles | May 09, 2008 at 10:00 AM
i was rather disappointed that miller|hull won an award for a building that opened over 3 years ago.
surely there were some recent projects that were just as worthy, if not more so...
Posted by: holz | May 19, 2008 at 11:33 PM