Earlier this week I toured the cluster of three buildings in Old Town at the edge of the Burnside Bridge being renovated into a new home for the University of Oregon's Portland Center, the White Stag block, under the design supervision of Fletcher Farr Ayotte.
Comprised of the White Stag Building (1907), the Skidmore Block (1889) and the Bickel Block (1883), the new UO home is in its late stages of construction now, with a move-in planned for February. Inside there will be numerous classrooms, offices, and meeting spaces, all connected with lots of wide-open public spaces that double as introducer of natural light.
But that's only the start of the green features (appropriate for UO, by the way). Rainwater harvesting will allow gray-water to be used for all toilets and urinals, reducing water usage by 86 percent. The building will also be 30 percent more energy-efficient than ASHRAE code standards. That is very, very impressive for an old cluster of buildings on the National Register with lots of restrictions for reconstruction. Photovoltaic solar panels will also be installed on the roof, presumably beside the 'Made In Oregon' sign.
And speaking of the sign, I'm told that could change slightly. The deer is restricted, and even the typeface and size. However, 'Made' could possibly changed to 'University of'', which seems a fair move since the 'Made in Oregon' text isn't original. Actually, neither is the White Stag brand that most people remember. Originally it was a sign for White Satin sugar. Apparently somewhere there is an old photo of Roy Rogers riding his horse Trigger across the Burnside Bridge during the Rose Parade with the White Satin sign in the background.
Although it's hard to tell with the hard hats, dust and hammering still going on, it clearly seemed like the middle portion between the buildings with nicely preserved brick cladding a kind of mini-winter garden, and a ceiling atrium flooding the space with illumination, will be an extra special place to be. I also liked the studio space reserved for architecture classes on the southeast corner of the White Stag building, where big look out onto the eternally under construction Burnside bridge.
Of the three buildings, the White Stag one seems the least interesting, with a very simple brick palette that seems like it could have come from any time in the 20th Century, but both the Bickel and Skidmore buildings are wonderful examples of classic late 19th century Portland architecture with handsome detailing and color. That the mostly front Naito Parkway and Waterfront Park gives the project the chance not only to re-invigorate Old Town, but the waterfront as well.
As such, I was disappointed to hear that the main entrance to the Portland Center will be on Couch Street, not on Naito Parkway as the architecture seems to indicate. However, it sounds like a future renovation could easily restore the entrance at the front of the building where it belongs. And even if it doesn't, it's clear that this project will be a real catalyst for this area, achieving laudable historic preservation in prime downtown real estate while setting up the most downtrodden area in the central city for a real renaissance.
It's all so nice, I can almost make myself forget that the UO's football team has arguably suffered its most tragic season in its entire 113-year history.
I can't wait til they get the portland center open.
Posted by: warren buffet | November 30, 2007 at 02:19 PM
I wish they installed a better cornice than that simplified one. Couldn't they have found photos of the original cornice for making a new replacement?
Posted by: Elian Gonzalez | November 30, 2007 at 03:36 PM
I'm with them up until the "University of" part. Really? I can't really think of another way to describe the way that sounds other than 'trashy.' Kind of embarrassing. I hope they think better of it. It would be a shame considering the relative merit of the rest of the project.
Posted by: matthew | December 01, 2007 at 12:23 AM
I agree. It's a terrible idea for that sign. The Burnside Bridge is such an iconic entrance into downtown and that sign is much too large to simply promote a single building. But then again, we are about to destroy Burnside and Couch with that miserable couplet project.
Posted by: Aneeda | December 01, 2007 at 11:38 AM
The name change to University of...would be awesome, maybe we could ruin some more Portland land marks...maybe the OSU pitock mansion and Portland State University Portlandia statue...even the Concordia Fremont bridge...i do not know, what do you think? I imagine changing that to university of would stir more then good ol cezar Chavez mess did... Way to break the streak Beavs!!!
Posted by: awesome | December 01, 2007 at 09:37 PM
The University of Oregon's mascot is the Ducks. OSU's home of the Beavs.
Great article Mr. Libby.
I'm sure the reason for the possible sign change would be the increased presence the U of O is attempting to have in Portland. Despite ads on the MAX trains, every time I tell someone I attend the U of O in Portland I'm met with confusion.
awesome, what personal connection do you have to the "Made in Oregon" sign and what about it is so valuable to you?
Posted by: not really | December 01, 2007 at 10:06 PM
"Made in Oregon" is just a retail chain. The sign has changed several times through history and it has always been advertising, so what's so wrong with advertising the University? It is at least a public institution rather than some commercial product or retail chain. I think it is very fitting to change it. The historic qualities(the font, the state outline, the stag) will stay. I think there are also first amendment issues with limiting the contant of the text on a private billboard, even with its historic status.
Posted by: robert | December 01, 2007 at 11:05 PM
the nice thing about it being Made in oregon is that most people do not associate that with some store, more with a pride of oregon
Posted by: awesome | December 02, 2007 at 07:24 PM
Maybe when Disney decides against renewing the licensing agreement allowing the use of Donald, the "Oregon Stags" will catch on.
Go Stags!
Posted by: DC | December 03, 2007 at 11:04 AM
I have to admit. I cringed at the thought of a "University of" neon change. I agree it's in their right but it somehow comes across tacky. Regardless, welcome to the neighborhood UO.
Posted by: chris | December 03, 2007 at 11:33 AM
If the "University of" is added, look for a prominent Oregon State University sign to pop up somewhere in Portland.
Posted by: architect | December 03, 2007 at 07:48 PM
I agree, the "Made In Oregon," sign never makes me think of the store, it just fills me with a bit of Oregon pride as I cross over the river. Especially they way it's sequenced - Made...in....OREGON and then it all lights up and sparkles... I'd hate to see it go.
Posted by: Jeremy | December 03, 2007 at 08:36 PM
A more accurate reflexion of the state of affairs would be "Made in China", also spelled out in chinese characters (since Chinatown is closeby) now that would make a splash!
Posted by: Nikos | December 04, 2007 at 11:35 AM
Gang,
I think I may have stirred things up unnecessarily with the sign. As far as I know, the UO doesn't necessarily have any plans to change the sign from Made In Oregon to anything else. I merely asked the person from UO leading the tour, vice provost Terri Warpinski, if it was a possibility. My only motivation was that I'm a big Ducks fan, but even I'm not necessarily advocating the sign be changed. Mabe leaving the sign as-is would be the best move. I'm not sure. But I wouldn't worry about it at this point. Any change seems only talk at this point--if that.
Posted by: Brian Libby | December 04, 2007 at 11:53 AM
I think the university missed a big opportunity in how they handled the mechanical systems on the upper levels of the white stag building. You can see in the photos that the mechanical ducts hang down into the space. If you were there you would also see that there are operable windows and an operable clerestory that would provide great ventilation. If heat could have been added to the floor via radiant tubing, you would have had a beautiful space sans ductwork, that I would bet would be more energy efficient than a ducted air system. I guess I assume that you don't really need air conditioning in Portland. I guess that is hard for developers to understand? Too bad.
Posted by: Tim | December 11, 2007 at 02:57 PM