Tonight at 7PM at the Portland Art Museum's Whitsell Auditorium, I will be introducing a special screening of Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey and leading an audience discussion afterward. Part of the NW Film Center's ongoing Kubrick retrospective, it's a favorite film of mine (in the top 3 with Le Samourai and Star Wars). I wanted to mention this not just as shameless self-promotion, although it is admittedly that, but also because my first 2001 viewing was very much an architecturally important experience.
While I was growing up, I heard about Kubrick's film a lot from my dad - it was pretty much his favorite movie. But I never watched the picture once in those years (I would have been too young to appreciate it anyway). My dad actually made me promise that I would wait, however long it took, to see 2001: A Space Odyssey on a big screen. When I finally got my chance in 1993, I was 21 years old and living in Washington, DC. The American Film Institute held a special 25th anniversary screening at the Uptown Theater, where Kubrick's film had premiered on April 1, 1968. One of the special effects supervisors from the movie came and gave a slideshow presentation before the screening on how they built the sets. Even author Arthur C. Clarke (writer of the original short story) sent a tape-recorded message to the audience from his home (which the guy apparently never ever leaves) in Sri Lanka.
And you know what? It was great. Waiting over 20 years to see the movie on a big screen was worth it. The movie totally blew me away, and I'm not sure that would happened on TV, even without commercials. Funnily enough, though, I almost never go to movie theaters now. To borrow from an old Folgers commercial, I love the big screen, but it's the fellow moviegoers I could do without.
It seems like movie theaters could be going the way of the dinosaur. You can buy a television now practically as big as smaller theater screens. What's to be gained?
But then I think of how seeing Kubrick's picture in the Uptown Theater for the first time was one of the most awe-inspiring experiences of my life. It's why I'll be first in line tonight at the Whitsell even though I'm exhausted with 5 hours of sleep.
That also begs the question: What are Portland's best existing movie theaters? You could answer it based on architecture, technology or other criteria. My favorite is the Moreland Theater in Southeast, where they still have old school red velvet curtains and vanilla Coke, and the ticket taker doubles as the popcorn vendor. Others probably prefer the more luxurious environment of Living Room Theaters or Cinetopia. Still others like the vaudevillian vibe of the Clinton Street Theater. I defy anyone to choose a Regal Cinemas venue, though - too antiseptic and corporate.
Anybody else got a movie palace they love or a movie that can only be seen in a darkened theater?
Another awesome thing about the Moreland: they've cut out part of a wall on the 2nd floor so that women can still watch the movie as they wait in line for the bathroom.
Posted by: Valarie | August 03, 2007 at 12:26 PM
The Living Room Theater in the Pearl is great if you want to watch a movie without being surrounded by plebs.
Posted by: Matt Davis | August 03, 2007 at 01:39 PM
How can you say that the Hollywood theater is not the best in town - it is a lynch movie within a lynch movie.
Posted by: john | August 03, 2007 at 04:45 PM
Excellent point. I guess I just don't go to the Hollywood much in part because I don't like that area. where Sandy bisects I-84 and you can't make a left turn for miles. I wish a streetcar went down Sandy and it was more pedestrian friendly.
Incidentally, I think the Hollywood would be well served if there were a decent development that went in next door, where the vacant lot is now.
Posted by: Brian Libby | August 03, 2007 at 04:56 PM
Incidentally, I'm a huge David Lynch fan too. If it's not to crass or shameless of me, check out this interview from late 2001:
http://archive.salon.com/people/bc/2001/11/06/lynch/index.html
Posted by: Brian Libby | August 03, 2007 at 04:59 PM
The Bagdad. I love the vintage movie palace "theme" decor and the way they opened up the old balcony.
And I'm still miffed that Tom Moyer demolished the Broadway Theater years ago. A good remodel could have turned it into a stunning venue.
Posted by: djk | August 04, 2007 at 09:25 AM
Brian,
actually there is a mixed use project suppose to start in 44th and sandy..gerding + gbd architects. wholefoods and washington mutuals on the ground floor and 4 floors of condos aboved.
the designed is pretty uninspiring, but somehow it did not make any news at all.,
Posted by: kolas | August 04, 2007 at 11:27 AM
Actually, I knew about that project but forgot. I'm actually really sad to see that bank being torn down. I thought it was a really nice midcentury modern building with tons of glass and a quiet elegance.
Posted by: Brian Libby | August 04, 2007 at 02:28 PM
To clarify, the project referenced above is 1 floor of retail at grade (whole foods, washington mutual, + one small retail space), 2 floors of parking above, and 2 floors of condos on top the parking.
But to the movie theatres, I'm a sucker for IMAX; though if you get a seat on the periphery or a movie with a lot of quick action, it can make for a headache induced viewing in the dome.
Posted by: Agustin Enriquez V | August 04, 2007 at 02:58 PM
Cinema 21. Not pretentious or crowded. Nice pre-show illumination and music. Fun springy seats and a balcony for making out. Cheap food and tickets too.
Livingroom is what i like to call "Washington County Luxe" meaning it embraces all the cliche style and material choices so popular in those McMansions. No soul and no balls. Very disappointing to see an exit sign so near the screen as it cast a bight LED glow over the screen.
Posted by: nrv | August 04, 2007 at 05:36 PM
Though I'm a fan of the Bagdad and of the Moreland, I still Like the Laurelhurst theater in all its dingy glory. Cheap tickets, cheap food/drink, and classic movie posters on the walls. It's unpretentious and comfortable.
Posted by: Jaime | August 04, 2007 at 11:26 PM
I have to second Matt Davis' recommendation of Living Room Theaters. To clarify, it is not in the Pearl, but on SW 10th and Stark. Brian, it's a few doors down from the checkerboard building you are so fond of.
What's the name for this district? I know it used to called the the "Pink Triangle" and a few other names I probably shouldn't post.
Posted by: Robert | August 05, 2007 at 06:27 PM
Let me third that: Living Room Theaters are the most comfortable movie theaters I've ever been in -- anywhere. Really comfortable seats, really wide aisles, cocktails, small and intimate screening rooms; what's not to like?
I wonder why, whenever anyone is asked to name "favorite" movie theaters, almost always the answer is some vintage theater or other, like Moreland or Laurelhurst or Cinema 21. I suspect nostalgia, more than anything else, factors into those answers.
By the way, though Brian defied anyone to name a Regal theater they like, I'll admit it: The stadium theaters at Pioneer Place are pretty darn comfortable too. I think Portlanders don't realize just how good they have it here. When I lived in Boston a decade ago, there wasn't a movie theater anywhere in the city that wasn't downright awful.
Posted by: Carlo | August 05, 2007 at 10:09 PM
The Mission Theater is the first pub theater I went to - beer and movie, yeah! It is still my favorite, just saw Paprika there Saturday.
Posted by: jojo | August 06, 2007 at 09:03 AM
I always enjoyed Cinema 21, viewing from the balcony up front. It's great for old movies. Think I've been to the Moreland once, long ago. It has a certain elegance in a modest way compared to its far more fantastic cousins (to a large degree vanished into history,) that modern theaters like those in the Moyer Tower are completely devoid of. I think that's why people keep mentioning the old theaters.
The Koin cinemas were a great place to go too at one time when they still existed, until they stopped maintaining them properly.
I've got great appreciation for the Bagdad, but don't like the acoustics. The mission is a good place to drink beer, socialize, and casually watch a movie, but I never thought it was a very good place to seriously view one.
Never been to LRT, but expect those would be good.
Posted by: ws | August 06, 2007 at 12:46 PM
"Waiting over 20 years to see the movie on a big screen..."
But you were 21 when you first saw it?
So you were even AWARE of the film when you were under ONE year old?
Somehow, I doubt it.
Posted by: chuck | November 04, 2009 at 04:10 AM