A few weeks ago a local architect friend wrote me to say he’d just come back from New York City. He was breathless with excitement at the city’s architectural treasures and its vibrant never-sleep urban spirit. He told me it was pretty tough coming back to Portland.
Well, I just got back from a trip of my own to New York and Washington, DC. With my friend’s comments in my mind, and because the two cities are significant ones (the nation’s political and cultural/financial capitals, respectively), not to mention cities I lived in for most of the 1990s, I couldn’t help but compare the Big Apple and the inner Beltway to Portland once more.
But I came to a different conclusion than my friend did. Let’s just say I’m very happy to be back.
Going to NYC and DC, one can’t help but feel impressed by the skyline. In DC it’s the White House, Capitol, Washington Monument and other landmarks that stand out, while New York has not only individual icons such as the Empire State building and Statue of Liberty, but the sheer scale and vastness of Manhattan. You can see that skyline from miles away like you can Hood, St. Helens and Adams—only they’re man made, veritable Egyptian pyramids for America.
Of course in terms of cultural offerings, no city in America, or perhaps even the world, can beat New York City. The array of art, food and entertainment available is too limitless to mention.
But in both cities—especially New York—there’s a layer of soot and grime covering everything. The entire infrastructure, from roads and sidewalks to even the lampposts, seems to have long since fallen into decay. Even if you're one of the select few who can afford a beautiful brownstone, you can't escape the harshness of the city. (I saw a homeless man walking barefoot in 18-degree weather; it broke my heart, but I knew from experience that if I lived there, I'd be much less phased.)
On a human level, you buy something at a store and the clerk never says one word but the amount of money due and never once looks you in the eye. (I know these are more often than not good people, but they sure don't show it in public. You can't do it there and expect to survive.)
Wilsonville or Cedar Mill would be considered inner suburbs in the East Coast megalopolis. Scaffolding clings to seemingly every other building. Warranted or not, there's a constant feeling of threat that The Big One - not an earthquake but some massive bomb - is inevitably going to come.
In Manhattan the winter sun shines much more regularly than it does here, but the height of the buildings means you’re usually walking in shadow. Oh, and you think a break from the rain is nice? Most of the year it’s either way too hot and humid or way too cold and icy.
When you're talking about Washington, it's really the greater metro area that includes area in Maryland and Virginia. The District of Columbia is a very small geographical pocket. And the city was once known as the murder capitol of America. The intersection of states with the district has meant that the city is severed as a working entity.
Except for pockets like Georgetown and Mount Pleasant, most people earning higher incomes live in Maryland or Virginia, and there is insufficient tax revenue to account for the needs of an under-privileged poor population already burdened, as a mostly African-American population, with intense racism. DC has rebounded like a lot of inner American cities, but the Bush administration certainly hasn't helped things with slashed funding for education and social services and a tax plan favoring the wealthy. In DC these underlying themes are indispensible from a view of the city.
Because local building codes limit height in order to preserve the integrity of the monuments on the Mall, the nation's capitol does have a more human scale akin to Paris or other European cities. It's got a stunning museum collection, and they're all free. There's also a legendary punk rock scene, which earns it a gold star with yours truly.
But the downside of DC's smaller-scale urban fabric is that it adds to the feeling that this where no matter how important the running of the country may be at certain addresses in the middle of Washington, in terms of everyday life the suburbs have swallowed the city there.
While visiting for the last week, I had a great time even as DC and NYC annoyed and exhausted me. I love New York’s subway, how it covers ground so much more quickly than MAX or the streetcar and how you can always count on a station being located conveniently nearby. NYC and DC also have real museums—sorry PAM and OHS, but you’d be second or third-tier there at best.
But without fail, everyone I whom I told I was from Portland launched into a soliloquy about what a great city they thought it was. How beautiful both the urban and natural landscapes were. What great wine and beer and coffee we had, and how many smart, creative people they knew who had migrated there. That it was, like NY and LA and a handful of other larger cities, a liberal oasis amidst a desert of conservativism. Sure, the city is a little small and provincial. But overall there’s something successful and even spiritual happening in Portland. That was the message I got.
As much as I love great architecture and urban planning, I'm glad that the icons on our landscape are snow-capped mountains. I don't even visit Oregon's natural wonders very often, but it's humbling to be reminded so regularly of how we fit onto the land. When I was in college in New York, I remember being depressed because I couldn't see the horizon. Much as I loved the pizza, the city made me feel like a jack in the box.
While it’s always fun to visit these two Meccas of America, I’m even happier every time I come back. Oh, and did I mention how much nicer our airport is?
I remember the first time I went to NY and was awestruck by the vastness of all the high rises and it made me think about how a friend described it in comparrison to Portland. He said that "New York was a city with a park in it and Portland was a park with a city in it". Fitting, right?
Posted by: michael conroy | March 02, 2006 at 03:29 PM
A lot of people I knew back in Mississippi always said the same thing.
In this situation though I'd have to agree. New York is just a bit much. Portland on the other hand is just the right size, more human size to me.
...but boy do I love a visit to New York!!!
Posted by: adron | March 02, 2006 at 03:35 PM
As a current resident of DC, your review sounded like someone who visited the city, made a snap judgement, and them moved on.
But whatever, I like Portland better as well.
Uh, and the Bush Administration just allocated 1 billion dollars to DC schools.
Posted by: justin | March 03, 2006 at 10:00 AM
I remember a number of years ago the actress Faye Dunaway in town to shoot a movie being asked by a local reporter what she thought of Portland and this is what I recall her saying. . . I live in NYC. I love NYC but if NYC were a small town, Portland would be it.
Posted by: Philippe | March 03, 2006 at 10:01 AM
Justin, you're half right. My visit to DC this time around was short and not even remotely comprehensive. But I also lived there for two years, and many of my comments were based on that experience more than my short recent visit there. I like DC in a lot of ways, so I hope you aren't coming away with the idea that I dislike it. I'm just aware of its problems, from incompetent city government to a disproportionate suburban feel. But I'll always be loyal to DC as well.
Posted by: Brian | March 03, 2006 at 10:11 AM
Great post. I'm an East Coast native, and when I lived closer I used to visit both NYC and DC frequently. I still love NY -- it is the center of the universe, after all -- but I've always thought that to live there successfully you had to be either very young (and thus willing to endure all the hassles) or very rich (so you could buy your way out of the same). I guess pretty much the same could be said of DC. Now when I go back, as I did a few weeks back, I'm just amazed at how breathtakingly expensive everything is. And I'm reminded that, in comparison, hassle-free Portland somehow managed to get nearly everything right. (Even visiting downtown Seattle now makes me appreciate the human scale of Portland.)
When we decided to move here last year and started telling our friends and colleagues back east, I was surprisd by two things: 1) Very few people knew anything at all about Portland. 2) But of those who did, not a single one had anything negative to say about Portland.
And Portland does have one great thing that neither NYC or DC do: a sort of indefinable buzz that makes you think, 10 or 20 years down the road, it will be an even better place to live than it is today
Posted by: Carl Herko | March 03, 2006 at 10:56 AM
I love Michael Conroy's comment. Having lived in NYC for eight years and in Portland for eight years, I think there's another thing that really separates the two. In Portland, there is really a DIY ethic, a sense that each individual has some power to get things done, and that there's a community that will support you. You can get people to vote on your ballot measure. You can open your own clothing shop. You can make your own film and get it shown somewhere. Hell, you can create your own film festival, put up a screen in your backyard and people will come. Portland is small enough so that you can do things that get seen and heard, but big enough so that those things matter. It's really ideal.
Except for the theater. The theater was much better in New York. Oh, yeah - and Polish food. Just try and find pierogi out here when the Polish Festival isn't going on. Okay, other than that, Portland is really ideal.
Posted by: Valarie | March 03, 2006 at 12:19 PM
Everyone's got great comments so far on Brian's thoughts.
As for me, I don't have much experience with DC except a week when I was very young, which obviously doesn't count for much. However, I can tell you its def not on my list...
As for NYC...what can you say except that it really is the capitol of the world. There is so much to do there and its so vibrant! I've never been anywhere like it; its almost like a fantasy turned into reality.
But of course, NYC has some big downsides.
I'm not in PDX at the moment, however, I'm a native and I've spent five great years there post university. At this time I'm enjoying living in Europe and expanding my already wide horizons (thanx to ptown) and maybe I'll try NYC for a year or two in a little while.
BUT...I know that my heart is and will be in my hometown. Its a place I love and appreciate more as I get older and experience other cities.
Portland is really unparalleled in my estimation. And while there are many changes I would make (if I were king...) I know that it has that something that only a very few cities have.
Even though PDX is small, I would def compare it to NYC, Paris, SF and maybe even other "great" cities (tho of course there are many great cities I haven't spent a long time in, and many more that I've never been to).
As someone wrote, Portland is going to even better in the coming decades. Its exciting to think of the possibilities, and I really think Portland can be THE city of the early 21st century... Size won't have anything to do with it. It'll be about substance.
Posted by: nathan | March 03, 2006 at 01:32 PM
I'm sitting at the Jet Blue waiting area at JFK for my long, 6 1/2 hour entry back to Portland, opened my iBook and visited this site.
And I had to say something.
I am high with the intensity of experiences over the last non-stop 60 hours in the city. Belle & Sebastian were amazing. The sun was out, with snowy landscape. Really noticed the rich architecture, the public art (statues of the lions at the library), of the city and realized that the large scale of buildings and vastness of open areas such as central park south along with the beauty of the empire state building were sublime, which I stared at for a time in meditation.
I'm was in NYC to bring some of the energy back home. To that end, I am planning a "creative village" concept for the North Mississipp District with the amenities that such a place could offer.
Use your imagination and you'll get the idea.
I will be partnering with one of the great architecture firms In New York City. The villiage will include several types of housing, both for sale and rentals, live/work and retail spaces. all tenants will be local or from the region.
Oh, they're calling my row...
Posted by: Randy Rapaport | March 04, 2006 at 03:54 PM
Wow - The Belmont Street lofts guy speaks! Randy, must say - love what you're doing to this town! Keep it up, looking forward to seeing what kind of creative energy can be harnessed in PDX
Posted by: Justin | March 05, 2006 at 12:59 PM
You guys forgot what else makes Portland so great: very few minorities and plenty of white people.
Heh. Just kidding. But honestly, Portland has got to be one of the whitest cities in the US.
And Brian, I agree with your comment on DC Government. Truly incompetent.
Posted by: Justin M | March 06, 2006 at 12:40 PM
I believe there are certain stigmas associated with such landmark cities like New York and Washington D.C. that perpetuate the "Anybody who's anybody" notion in the professional world, especially among the younger ones. People tout their design prowess by prefacing with the fact that they have worked in The Big Apple, like somehow it has made them good designers. Granted the conditions are harsher, competition stronger, and people do have to be on their toes more, but is it that much different than anywhere else? Unless you live in a locality where your specific firm has the sole market share, you are going to have to be very business conscious, be competitive, and be creative, or you wouldn't be able to survive. In recent times, several of my contemporaries have made the move to NY, and in current conversations speak as if there were NO design opportunities in Portland. But with a bit of detective work, one will find that the design community in Portland stands head-to-toe among the best in the country. Look at the work that comes out of the PDX Design Collaborative, our world class architecture firms, our industrial designers, as well as out burgeoning art sector. There is a reason why many of the biggest firms in all areas of commerce and design have decided to call Portland their own, Nike, Ziba Designs, and Addidas being just a few.
Another question is, why do so many who move to this so called "Mecca" of design in the east, move back? It almost seems as though they need to prove their mettle in such an environment. For those who say that the Big City affords them more contact with current veins in design are right. It does, for it drops it right in your lap and blurts itself into your face. Passive learning indeed. In my experience, those who work, who seek out, who actively research the "pulse" of architecture become better designers in the end, no matter where they come from. In fact, current Pritzker prize winner Thom Mayne himself came from a very unassuming birth, as well as manyother that did not work within the boundaries of New York-like settings.
There are other things about Portland that add to its great eminence, the pedestrian quality is among the best on an international scale. Brian mentioned the awe inspiring views of our spectacular natural landmarks, but also the largest urban forest system in the country, as well as the prior mentioned beer, wine, and coffee virtually unrivaled nationwide.
As a provincial city, it has the framework for a huge potential of growth. With careful forethought and planning regarding the city as a WHOLE, Portland’s prominence on the scene can only become more brilliant.
Posted by: Joshua Chang | March 07, 2006 at 09:44 AM
A few comments, some likely off the subject of the post, but anyways..
Brian: Cheers to the Dischord blurp! Did you see the documentary on 930 F Street at MusicFest Northwest last summer? Love me some Minor Threat!
Valarie: Try the little booth at Saturday market for perogies. If it is still there.
Randy: the belle and sebastian! We've got some good music fans on this here site! Keep up the good work!
See you all on the road.
Posted by: matt daby | April 06, 2006 at 04:11 PM